4 ms·
Or get the source code using Git, which actually (by design) guarantees that its checksums are stable.
by Denvercoder9 4y ago
Or get the source code using Git, which actually (by design) guarantees that its checksums are stable.
- pxc 4y agoThat's a good point. It's way more resource-intensive and much slower, which is why it's not preferred in Nixpkgs, for example. But it's also vulnerable to the same problem in that your package manager's build system is still dependent on GitHub. It will take more to screw you up, but a whole GitHub outage, for example, will definitely still hurt.
- ilyt 4y agoIt's not depending on github-specific functionality tho. You can just redirect it to another mirror of git repo of the project
- ecnahc515 4y agoDownloading a source tarball is significantly cheaper on both sides than git. A source tarball is 100% served from CDNs, whereas I don't believe the same isn't quite true for git (even over https).