3 ms·
I wonder if there is a sweet spot between the two. Have a rigid structure with an internal pressure less than one, but more than zero atmospheres.
by Asooka 4y ago
I wonder if there is a sweet spot between the two. Have a rigid structure with an internal pressure less than one, but more than zero atmospheres.
- Tuna-Fish 4y agoThere is not. The costs of dealing with pressure differentials are extreme, and there are a lot of small thorny issues. For one, if you have a pressure differential, you need to care very much about even the tiniest leaks. A surprising fact about airships is that they don't actually have to be very gas-tight to work just fine. As people found to their surprise in both world wars, you can shoot an airship full of small holes and it only very slowly degrades in performance.
- hutzlibu 4y agoYes, if you just shoot a hydrogen airship, not much happened, only after they introduced incendiary rounds, strong damage was done.
- hutzlibu 4y agoNo idea why this was downvoted, but in case anyone believed it was imaginary: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pomeroy_bullet https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pomeroy_bullet
- taneq 4y agoAt the halfway point you get 7% more lift but still need to withstand ~50kPa of external pressure. I can't see how you'll ever build a rigid structure that can withstand 5 tonnes per square meter and only weighs 7% more than a gas bag which operates only under a tiny fraction of that force and only under tension.