Hehe, no worries. We're in pretty good agreement I think, and I don't think I mis-interpreted your comment either (so no worries, no offense taken). The OP que

Hehe, no worries. We're in pretty good agreement I think, and I don't think I mis-interpreted your comment either (so no worries, no offense taken). The OP question was: "why is this political" My response should have been a lot more concise. In sum: "This is a 'man bites dog story' that can be used to create a false equivalence for the prevalence of harassment between men & women, which can then be used in an attack-the-messenger style argument of "you don't actually care about sexual harassment, you just want to attack men'" The amount of nuance here is pretty astounding, so those that want a status quo really want us to be having this conversation. > Sorry. I hope you have a nice week. No need to apologize, and the comment was not without its merits! It's a nuanced issue and discussion! My same wishes for you!