3 ms·
No, I don't think that's fair. I'm talking when it's large businesses. Keep in mind, I'm not espousing a legal doctrine here. I'm just saying that's what my gut
by anm89 4y ago
No, I don't think that's fair. I'm talking when it's large businesses. Keep in mind, I'm not espousing a legal doctrine here. I'm just saying that's what my gut reaction is.
So I feel bad for a small business owner who get's affected and just see them as collateral damage in the other issue
- gruez 4y ago> No, I don't think that's fair. I'm talking when it's large businesses. That seems like a pretty important point to omit, don't you think? Moreover, I addressed this point in my original comment. Sure, the business loses a few million dollars in damages, but what about all the previous employees that were displaced? Were they acceptable collateral damage? What about "large businesses" that won't engage in such behavior? Do you think they're acceptable collateral damage as well and/or that all "large businesses" would engage in such behavior? >Keep in mind, I'm not espousing a legal doctrine here. I'm just saying that's what my gut reaction is. Don't you think, we as a society should expect that whatever people are espousing something publicly, that they should have given thought/consideration that's above "gut reaction"?