> there's no sky friend looking out for us That's much too simplistic and isn't going to convince anyone of the point you're trying to make. > his has been re

> there's no sky friend looking out for us That's much too simplistic and isn't going to convince anyone of the point you're trying to make. > his has been replaced by ersatz religions, but I think we should start explicitly worshipping the concept of civilization and progress We've done this multiple times before and always with disastrous or at least dissipative results. The technical term for this is "cult" and more specifically "idolatry". There are very good reasons why this has generally been proscribed by monotheistic religions. > civilization is a cybernetic organism that encompasses all of us Saying civilization is cybernetic in that it consists of feedback loops that keep it in a stable condition is stretching it. Perhaps a nation could be cybernetic since it contains a variety of channels through which this information can flow in both directions but a civilization as a supranational system has some very tight bottlenecks that would impede such functioning. > gives us all sorts of neat things It does not. People do that and the things are not so much given as they are bargained for whether with money or by signing on to a social contract or adopting cultural values.