5 ms·
There was a third ruling in November 2022 for the case, so I wouldn’t say hiQ won. Based on a quick scan, the ruling ended up being that hiQ did violate TOS but
by bxji 4y ago
There was a third ruling in November 2022 for the case, so I wouldn’t say hiQ won. Based on a quick scan, the ruling ended up being that hiQ did violate TOS but that no action ended up being taken for either side.
https://www.natlawreview.com/article/court-finds-hiq-breached-linkedin-s-terms-prohibiting-scraping-mixed-ruling-declines https://www.natlawreview.com/article/court-finds-hiq-breache...
- henryfjordan 4y agooh interesting, thanks for the link. Yeah I guess they only "won" on the CFAA claims and even then your link makes it sounds less clear than the older link I provided. What is clear is that Linkedin is not playing around about logged-in scrapping.