4 ms·
I teach CS at a university. I've largely given up on trying to "catch cheaters." At this point, either a student wants to really learn the information or they
by recursivedoubts 4y ago
I teach CS at a university.
I've largely given up on trying to "catch cheaters." At this point, either a student wants to really learn the information or they don't.
What are you gonna do? Cheat your way to a programming degree and then... bomb at some programming job because you don't know how to actually code or think?
I try to set students up for success, w/clear & obvious requirements (e.g. test suites for project grading) and then appeal to their sense of reciprocity: I'm trying to be cool to you, please be cool w/me & don't cheat. If you feel like you need to cheat to pass, come talk to me so we can address the material instead.
Regurgitating was never a great way to measure understanding anyway. In an ideal world, I'd have the time to sit down with each student and have a 10 minute talk, and get a sense of how well they understand the material, like the old english system.
- mupuff1234 4y ago> In an ideal world, I'd have the time to sit down with each student and have a 10 minute talk, and get a sense of how well they understand the material. Aren't in-person exams a decent way to gauge that?
- cyphax 4y agoThey are in my experience, we do this as part of many of the courses and projects: they get an assignment followed by a 15-20 minute assessment of their work. Gives us the chance to measure their understanding of the work and it gives them the chance to clarify things that they didn't make clear in the work, which can lead to a slightly better grade.