2 ms·
A more conservative approach would be some sort of layered storage/archiving, I guess. The older the commit, the less likely it is to be used, so it could be ar
by tonnydourado 4y ago
A more conservative approach would be some sort of layered storage/archiving, I guess. The older the commit, the less likely it is to be used, so it could be archive in a different storage, optimized for long term. This way you keep the "hot" history small, while keeping the full history still available.
- howinteresting 4y agoThat's generally how git packs are used at large organizations that host their own repositories. I'm sure GitHub does something similar.