3 ms·
Right now, sure but doesn't seem to be their strategy long term. Why would they purposefully sabotage that as you're suggesting? https://www.volkswagen-newsroo
by barbazoo 4y ago
Right now, sure but doesn't seem to be their strategy long term. Why would they purposefully sabotage that as you're suggesting?
https://www.volkswagen-newsroom.com/en/strategy-3912 https://www.volkswagen-newsroom.com/en/strategy-3912
- mrguyorama 4y agoWhether it's purposeful or not doesn't matter. Right now Electrify America gives EV charging a bad rap. Tesla shows large scale charging networks are economically viable, and really Tesla should be pushing their network open ASAP, as you can sell fast charging at a serious premium and it would literally be free money for a network that currently is underutilized.
- bhauer 4y agoIf I were a company still on the low side of EV volume (GM, Ford, BMW, Mercedes, etc.), I would be seriously in negotiations with Tesla to adopt NACS and join the Supercharger network, allowing our customers to avoid the debacle of CCS. I consider any manufacturer that isn't making moves in that direction to be demonstrating an unserious attitude toward EVs. CCS is a total shambles in the United States and its headwind should cast doubt on any advertised optimism from manufacturers using CCS.
- matthewdgreen 4y agoMusk promised that the Tesla network would be open to other manufacturers by the end of 2022. Nobody really knows what's going on now, and I sure hope that the late-2022 decision to open-source the NACS standard isn't what's holding progress up. Only one of these two standards is going to win: the faster we pick one the quicker we can make progress. In this case while I prefer NACS myself, I'm worried that convincing a dozen manufacturers to switch standards is going to take much longer than just adding a second CCS connector to (many) Superchargers. Otherwise we could lose years to this, and still wind up with CCS everywhere.