> Wow, you're just being contrary to be contrary aren't you? Not at all. I'm pointing out that they don't have the properties that you're asking for in this c

> Wow, you're just being contrary to be contrary aren't you? Not at all. I'm pointing out that they don't have the properties that you're asking for in this case. > Further more, the reason standards are nice here is because a 3rd party is the one who blessed the technology, not the biased producer of the technology. And changes to that standard need to go through the standards body and the producer is not the single owner. Suppose that Google submitted all of those projects to a standards body, got them approved, and then made an incompatible change to their implementations. How does their status as a standard matter?