3 ms·
Presumably the employer wants/needs a staff. If they didn't they'd have gone contractor-only a long time ago. The immediate incentive is that the staff they wa
by britch 4y ago
Presumably the employer wants/needs a staff. If they didn't they'd have gone contractor-only a long time ago.
The immediate incentive is that the staff they want/need isn't doing the thing.
A strike is not a protest.
It's a negotiating tactic when you have much else leverage than your ability to work.
Realistically scabs/contractors might lessen the strike's leverage. The strike may push the publisher to go "staff-less".
Larger organized labor might be able to hold Harpers to account for working around the strike -- like if contractors were organized, if scabbing made it hard to get hired elsewhere. But that's not where labor is at currently.
- tomcam 4y ago> Realistically scabs/contractors might lessen the strike's leverage. The strike may push the publisher to go "staff-less". Seems inevitable to me. The publishers will sell their NYC real estate for a one-time bonanza, strip down to a skeleton crew of employees, and contract out most work. Quality will dip far below that of the last 100 years, and few will care. It was a golden age of publishing but I don’t think it’s remotely sustainable.