13 ms·
Ranking Node.js Module Authors
- ecto 15y agoThis is running on an EC2 micro instance through use of extensive caching. In addition to storing all static files in memory, I'm grabbing the data from npmjs.org and saving it in memory every 5 minutes. The server is just 35 LOC, you can check it out here https://github.com/ecto/npmtop.com https://github.com/ecto/npmtop.com
- rhizome 15y agoCan you increase the line-spacing a little more?
- ecto 15y agoAssuming you're being sarcastic. You're welcome to make a pull request if you don't like it, but I would start by changing the color palette on your website http://many9s.com/ http://many9s.com/
- rhizome 15y agoDo you attack everybody who criticizes you? You must be a joy to work with. P.S. Those colors were chosen for specific reasons.
- kyt 15y agoSeems like they should be ranked by SLOC or number of total watchers for their packages.
- ecto 15y agoGithub integration isn't a bad idea. What do you think the easiest way to grab SLOC/author is?
- malandrew 15y agoNumber of watchers and forks would be awesome, but including SLOC is a dubious metric IMHO. Other good metrics would be issues and pull request activity. A product with lots of pull requests and solved issues is one that is actively being used by people that probably matter. It would also be good to be able to rank modules by tags so that questions like, "what are the highest ranked testing libraries?" could be answered.
- DrJ 15y agothat's the first thing I noticed as well, it's based on the # of packages published by an author. Would be nice to be able to see a summary on their impact more than the # of packages. On another hand, I have met/worked with some of the people in the top #20 and I can say for sure they are major proponents(?) of Node.js. Heck, someone could go and published a lot of useless packages and get on the list! (if that kind of vanity was your thing) edit: michael jackson codes Node.js @ #310
- pors 15y agoCool logo, how did you make that? Is it a font?