I doubt it was incidental, because they were referring to “hereditary oligarchy”, which is different from merely having wealthy parents. It implies wielding pol

I doubt it was incidental, because they were referring to “hereditary oligarchy”, which is different from merely having wealthy parents. It implies wielding political power and using oppressive or tyrannical tactics, as well as amassing wealth in unfair and unethical ways. That’s why the Apartheid angle seems to be the key aspect of this argument whenever I see it raised online. It’s never just, “his father made money from investments”.