The OP said previously he wasn’t talking about political leanings. I’ll would add he was referring to the positioning of paper’s history of being more “low str

The OP said previously he wasn’t talking about political leanings. I’ll would add he was referring to the positioning of paper’s history of being more “low street”, sensationalist with lower journalistic standards as opposed to the high standards gold standard harbinger of Truth publications like the NYT. The reason this description looks so out of place now, it’s because the others suck so much and the Post continues being the Post.