8 ms·
> the internet becoming deep fried Good phrase. I've frequently heard the term "Kentucky Fried Education" applied to the decay of schools and universities unde
by nonrandomstring 4y ago
> the internet becoming deep fried
Good phrase. I've frequently heard the term "Kentucky Fried Education"
applied to the decay of schools and universities under the influence
of big-tech mediocrity. My Digital Vegan response would be that
"heavily processed" content harms your intellectual health because
it's not fresh and has no vitamins :)
Ted Nelson anticipated this "death by indirection". Some of his early
writings on hypertext still seem like they're from a future we might
one day get to. The idea that links should be bi-directional, and how
different the Internet would be, is still mind-blowing.
Most of the problems you describe stem from the mediating platforms
being fundamentally controlling and dishonest. Everything is a
work-around to around a work-around... all the way down.
> will never happen
I get the shrugging cynicism. But to me it's a good thing they're too
broken to change. Let these festering sewers of low-quality content
digest themselves and make room for new growth.
- ianai 4y agoCouldn't a bi-directional link still be written into HTML? Like any other tag, it could simply go unused while being available so nobody feels obligated.
- nonrandomstring 4y agoI'm not sure. It seems a reasonable question. I think the obstacle is the browser monopoly. For the same reasons the "semantic web" and RDF knowledge tri-graphs failed in the wild - the current paradigm is frozen in a "works for me" state of arrested development. You could theoretically build this behind the existing "web" but it would get no critical purchase.