3 ms·
> The key concept here is that if you're an issuer, you usually can't buy and sell your own issued stuff. (FTX did a lot of that. It didn't end well.) I don't
by olalonde 4y ago
> The key concept here is that if you're an issuer, you usually can't buy and sell your own issued stuff. (FTX did a lot of that. It didn't end well.)
I don't understand what the concern is here. Without an arbitrage mechanism, of course the peg is lost. As a counter-example, USDC allows both new issuances and redeems (it's not a trust but it's conceptually similar). ETFs also allow this mechanism to operate.
FWIW, I don't know why GBT hasn't re-enabled redeems if they're now allowed to do so. I was just going from what I read in the article.
PS: What ended badly at FTX is that they gambled with / stole customers' deposits, it's not really a comparable concept.
- Animats 4y ago> I don't know why GBT hasn't re-enabled redeems if they're now allowed to do so. Because they'd have to pay out money. Money they might not have.