4 ms·

When I first heard the "Believe women" slogan, I knew we are in trouble. As if women were inable to say anything but the truth.

• HideousKojima 4y ago
  I was falsely accused of sexual harassment when I was in 1st grade. I didn't start having anything resembling attraction to women until 3rd grade, by the way. We had some sort of combined activity with some 6th grade students. I dropped my pencil and crawled under the table to get it, and got back to work and didn't think anything of it. A 6th grade girl at the table got up and left the classroom, and 15 minutes later I was called up to the principal's office. They told me I was in big trouble for looking up girls' skirts and if I had anything to say for myself. I just got really confused and started crying, I told them I had no idea what they were talking about. Fortunately they believed me, but the fact that they took things that far in the first place left a very bad impression on me regarding both school administrators and sexual harassment claims. Edit: this was in the early 90's, by the way. I'm sure it's only gotten worse.
• LeoNatan25 4y ago
  “Believe women” is fine. “Believe all women” is where the problem lies.
  • fidgewidge 4y ago
    What's the difference?
    • noisy_boy 4y ago
      The latter removes any scope for taking circumstances/details into account which is an issue irrespective of gender/age etc (e.g. "believe men" or "believe children" would be equally absurd).
      • fidgewidge 4y ago
        But you just said "believe women" is fine whereas "believe men" or "believe children" is absurd. I don't follow the distinction you're drawing here. They're grammatically equal.
        • noisy_boy 4y ago
          I am saying blanket "believe <anything>" is absurd and I do see your point; there isn't much difference.