3 ms·
If what you care about is efficiency, then stick to static linking. Dynamic linking inhibits so many optimizations.
by Kranar 4y ago
If what you care about is efficiency, then stick to static linking. Dynamic linking inhibits so many optimizations.
- astrange 4y agoThis is not the answer the performance engineers at Apple will give you, otherwise they would've done that.
- mike_hearn 4y agoYou can have both. JIT compiled languages are dynamically linked yet optimization is done across module boundaries.
- pjmlp 4y agoBetter not do plugins with static linking, given the waste in hardware resources for communication and process managment. Both approaches have plus and minus regarding efficiency.