2 ms·

I don't think this is a case of dog-whistling, because AFAICT the author isn't trying to conceal his point. I.e., he intends every reader to recognize that he'

I don't think this is a case of dog-whistling, because AFAICT the author isn't trying to conceal his point. I.e., he intends every reader to recognize that he's saying that the publisher might be biased. He's not being explicit about what that bias is, but presumably he expects curious readers to look into it themselves.

caminante 4y ago
It's flawed (by your own definition) to say that just because you don't detect a dogwhistle that it's not a dogwhistle. >the author isn't trying to conceal his point False. The parent asked you to draw your own conclusions!