2 ms·
The Wikipedia page mentions Zambia, which was not under Apartheid to my knowledge. That’s an important distinction, and the original claim is factually incorrec
by mypastself 4y ago
The Wikipedia page mentions Zambia, which was not under Apartheid to my knowledge. That’s an important distinction, and the original claim is factually incorrect.
Wikipedia’s source also seems to be an interview with Errol, who claims to have had a part-stake in a mine. We don’t know how big. If someone owns some shares in Apple, saying they’re the company’s “owner” would be misleading, even if they made a good profit.
- simonh 4y ago>The Wikipedia page mentions Zambia, which was not under Apartheid to my knowledge. That’s an important distinction, and the original claim is factually incorrect. Would you say that the fact it was in Zambia is actually material to the point the poster was making about him coming from a wealthy background, or was it an incidental detail?
- mypastself 4y agoI doubt it was incidental, because they were referring to “hereditary oligarchy”, which is different from merely having wealthy parents. It implies wielding political power and using oppressive or tyrannical tactics, as well as amassing wealth in unfair and unethical ways. That’s why the Apartheid angle seems to be the key aspect of this argument whenever I see it raised online. It’s never just, “his father made money from investments”.