The original comment never provided evidence to back up the claimed primary goal. It seems everyone is arguing from a slippery slope point of view, which I can

The original comment never provided evidence to back up the claimed primary goal. It seems everyone is arguing from a slippery slope point of view, which I can understand given that both parties have achieved some goals using that technique. Thought it doesn't mean I don't agree with the stated goals that children should not be exposed to those things.