5 ms·
I don't think one is easier to refactor than the other
by baby 4y ago
I don't think one is easier to refactor than the other
- TurboHaskal 4y agoI'll take an over-engineered enterprisey Java monolith over a Haskell codebase written by type astronauts any time of the week. I mean, at least the former will be somewhat working and with proper IDE support.
- tome 4y agoHaskell programs are so phenomenally easy to refactor in deep and complex ways it's unreal. I have been astonished over and over again. (That said the state of automated, trivial refactorings (like renaming identifiers) is probably much better in other languages.)