I think the original graph maker is 99% the way there in the followup. This data makes no sense at all in a graph like this, a table sorted by percentage would

I think the original graph maker is 99% the way there in the followup. This data makes no sense at all in a graph like this, a table sorted by percentage would have been more illustrative, as well as something histogram flavored based on the absolute counts. Log graphs might be better but without a log unit that people can actually grok I think it’s pointless. We’re looking at percent change. What does the difference in the distance between +25% to +15% vs +25% to -10% even tell you? Ahh yes the relative difference of the relative change.