The way I see it, ChatGPT is the "low code" edition of GPT. You wouldn't do a feature-by-feature comparison of both as they're for different things. The questi

The way I see it, ChatGPT is the "low code" edition of GPT. You wouldn't do a feature-by-feature comparison of both as they're for different things. The question is on content generation, which GPT-3/davinci excels at. ChatGPT does chat and memory better. Also the long winded responses are already in the nature of text-davinci-003, though it faces similar problems with refusing to do certain types of content.