6 ms·
It is reasonable to ban all social media of any kind of on an employee phone in my opinion. The government deciding that you can use set of social media apps b
by ThinkBeat 4y ago
It is reasonable to ban all social media of any kind of on an employee phone in my opinion.
The government deciding that you can use set of social media apps
but not another one is not as reasonable.
(Somewhat depending on what classifies as social media, where I would put "hooking up sites" in a different category)
- TAForObvReasons 4y agoIt is not unreasonable for governments to require all apps be published by US companies
- dpkirchner 4y agoWhat counts as a US company? TikTok Inc is based out of California.
- sidlls 4y agoThe beneficial owners are the CCP, via Bytedance.
- klipklop 4y agoGo interview there. At a high enough level everyone you interview with is in mainland China. They are a Californian company only in name. The guys running the company are in China. They don’t even do a good job hiding it.
- slim 4y agoThen US should make it a law that companies must be owned by americans (other countries have this kind of law) otherwise it's just racism and you would'n't mind if the company was ran by Swedish people
- klipklop 4y agoTrying to make this about race is lame. A weak straw man. (Reasonable and educated) People in the US don’t care about the race of TikTok upper management, they care about the influence of a hostile government that is openly waging a fourth-generation war with the US. Sweden for example is not. TikTok posing as an independent California company when we all know that is not the case is not helping them.
- peaky_blinder 4y agoReasonable and educated people in the US should be more critical of their own government which wages wars all around the world. China isn't a saint either but let's be real.
- vinay427 4y agoThis seems like a non sequitur, although I do agree that more people should be more critical or at least cautious to support actions by the US abroad. The parent comment didn’t compare the US and China (foreign policy or otherwise). For instance, there was no discussion of any US big tech involvement in China. They did, however, compare Sweden and China, both with respect to the US.
- vinay427 4y agoThis seems like a somewhat bad faith response given that the parent comment described the people as “in (mainland) China,” not “Chinese” or something else that could denote race/ethnicity along with nationality.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- noitpmeder 4y agoSo I shouldn't be able to install an Australian banking app on my US phone?
- TAForObvReasons 4y agoIt's not unreasonable for the US federal government to ban employees of the US federal government from using Australian banking apps on work devices issued by the US federal government. It is a separate conversation if any of those variables change.
- josephcsible 4y agoIf by "US phone", you mean "work phone issued by the US government", then that's right, you shouldn't.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- kube-system 4y agoIf you’re a government employee, installing an app for a foreign bank account on your work phone may be the least of your roadblocks in that regard. Foreign financial influence is a serious concern.
- indigodaddy 4y agoDoes not sound legal nor within the Constitution/free speech. Hope we don’t go down a road like this.
- insanitybit 4y agoGovernment institutions get to decide what goes on government devices.
- indigodaddy 4y agoAh didn’t read past the headline. Was assuming this was personal devices.
- ojbyrne 4y agoThe headline seems to describe the rest of the story. A bill was introduced to ban TikTok nationwide, and according to the article there is "increasing pressure" on the executive branch to introduce a nationwide ban.
- tccole 4y agoThis does not go against free speech if there’s government data on your device.
- PenguinCoder 4y agoThat's not how free speech is defined or works, legally.