> Source? Impossible (unfortunately) for reasons of privacy. > No engineer ... naive Your mistake is to imply that the "drive" lies with engineers - instead

> Source? Impossible (unfortunately) for reasons of privacy. > No engineer ... naive Your mistake is to imply that the "drive" lies with engineers - instead of a perverse economy in which some try to promote unneeded novelties to "have something new to sell - to people who already have everything". This was directly admitted by the involved. > a good idea Given the above, some believe it a potentially good idea "for the stockholders" (not for "function", as you seem to assume as a perspective).