22 ms·
CC0 is nice but why not CC 4.0 license? It still lets people use it for commercial use but has attribution. That way people can't sell the photo and claim it as
by porphyra 4y ago
CC0 is nice but why not CC 4.0 license? It still lets people use it for commercial use but has attribution. That way people can't sell the photo and claim it as their own, for example.
- culi 4y agoI think you mean CC BY 4.0. There's CC0, CC BY, CC BY-SA, CC-BY-NC, or other combinations of below: BY: attribution SA: share-alike NC: non-commercial ND: no derivatives The "0" in CC0 just means no rights reserved. "4.0" is just the latest version of the legal code. There was a CC BY 3.0 and a CC BY 2.0, etc.
- porphyra 4y agoOh yes, you're right. I think the most common one on Wikimedia Commons is CC BY-SA 4.0.