Thanks. Reading the license they seem to say the intent is to have to "give something back" for using the code. If we were to release just the portion of the c

Thanks. Reading the license they seem to say the intent is to have to "give something back" for using the code. If we were to release just the portion of the code that uses it, I feel that it would serve as an excellent real-world example of the use of this library which would be helpful to many. But honestly, if there's an alternative to this library with a different license I'm more inclined to do that out of fear of compliance failures. Not against paying for software either, but this particular vendor doesn't advertise a price - they want to basically sit down and have a chat with you about how you use the library. That sounds like $$$$ to me, no doubt they will want to get into details about number of processors and threads and users and price accordingly.