3 ms·
Even during Debian's systemd adoption wars I'd never seen any argument calling into question Devuan as ''disreputable''. After all, it was a group of experience
by cf100clunk 4y ago
Even during Debian's systemd adoption wars I'd never seen any argument calling into question Devuan as ''disreputable''. After all, it was a group of experienced Debian folks that made a systemd-less version of Debian that compares almost exactly with Debian's status and capabilities. I hope in your case you have not been forced to use Devuan.
- shzhdbi09gv8ioi 4y agoHit me up when you finally notice that enterprise and seniors embraced systemd years ago while you kept avoiding change.
- cf100clunk 4y agoYou implied that Devuan is disreputable.
- codetrotter 4y agoI don’t think that’s what they are saying. Debian is reputable because it is widely widely used for ages. Devuan is not disreputable. It is simply a fringe variant of Debian that has much fewer users and no obvious reason to adopt for most people. Debian has a good reputation. Devuan does not have much of a reputation at all, because most people that might use it have no problem with using Debian and systemd.
- andrewshadura 4y ago> it was a group of experienced Debian folks No, it wasn't. There was only one ex-Debian person in their team.
- cf100clunk 4y agoI'd heard many times over the years that Roger Leigh was given a great deal of support by other Debian people, let alone across the Linux community. Maybe I misremembered.