3 ms·
For emergency communications (probably lower than 0.1/1mbps at 5/20km though), you might be able to get away with a LoRA.. Probably would be a lot cheaper to bu
by fIREpOK 4y ago
For emergency communications (probably lower than 0.1/1mbps at 5/20km though), you might be able to get away with a LoRA.. Probably would be a lot cheaper to build and lighter to carry around (all with a smaller antenna).
- capableweb 4y agoLoRa would indeed allow cheaper and more lightweight installations, but the bandwidth comparison between WiFi and LoRa makes LoRa basically not a comparison, unless you want to build something text-only over it. Forget being able to browse the web for example (besides HN probably). Edit: I see now you mention the bandwidth difference and saying to use LoRa just for emergency broadcasts, that'd make sense.