4 ms·

Sounds like you're almost re-implementing single threaded async

• smabie 4y ago
  Yeah I suppose I am, but the perf is better (very important in this particular use case) and the code is simpler (imo).
  • avinassh 4y ago
    But what makes the perf to be better? Better scheduling / less context switches?
    • deleted 4y ago
      [deleted]
    • conradludgate 4y ago
      I think using a simple single threaded executor gets you little context switching and such. The issue is that async generator codegen currently is not as good as we want it to be. Async futures currently take more space than they need to and have some issues with drop tracking. They're sound, but not necessarily efficient. These are not problems with the language or the feature, just the current implementation
  • insanitybit 4y ago
    Maybe check out glommio.