> The financial thing is a ridiculous premise anyway. There are plenty of people for example in the religious communities who have 5+ or even 10+ kids and those

> The financial thing is a ridiculous premise anyway. There are plenty of people for example in the religious communities who have 5+ or even 10+ kids and those kids are raised healthy, good and educated - all on modest incomes. Some people have to have children. I'm not opposed to other people having some children. What I am saying is there is not enough community support for everyone to have children. It is unhealthy for our society that some people have ten plus children and some have none. There should be an upper bound to how many biological children someone can have (my suggestion is two, maybe three but no more). There should be more support for all parents and children (no income/wealth cap or risk eligibility). You can still choose to not have children or have fewer than the upper bound.