4 ms·
Perhaps you are ascribing a more holistic view to the idea of what someone “does”. I think OP was referring more to a person’s roles or what they are known for.
by easygenes 4y ago
Perhaps you are ascribing a more holistic view to the idea of what someone “does”. I think OP was referring more to a person’s roles or what they are known for.
Loving someone for, e.g., what they believe in, what they stand for, and how they treat people are examples of love that stems from a deeper understanding of a person’s values, habits, and personality than just loving them one-dimensionally for their wealth or a particular thing they’re well known for. I think that’s what they’re getting at.
- green_on_black 4y agoSo, having more conditions is apparently less conditional?
- eurasiantiger 4y agoLoving someone for something and loving someone if something are two different things.