4 ms·
It is made to look like it knows and understands. It has mainstream packaging that everyone and their dog can use and postulate on. However, it doesn’t underst
by RHSman2 4y ago
It is made to look like it knows and understands. It has mainstream packaging that everyone and their dog can use and postulate on.
However, it doesn’t understand anything of its underlying subject matter.
It simply (!) has accumulated a wealth of information that it chooses the best answer for. Of course, that is very impressive but a thinking machine it is not.
My anxiety is not on the AI but the ability to game human kind and normalization of content. You think everything is quite similar now? Let’s see how it can determine what is new, real authentic human content versus bot rehashing?
- mansoon 4y ago“It simply (!) has accumulated a wealth of information that it chooses the best answer for. Of course, that is very impressive but a thinking machine it is not.” I’m very confused. I don’t think I’m different than this.
- jmopp 4y agoBehind your thinking is a lot of heuristics built up from decades of experience, along with the ability to use logic in addition to the information you've picked up. ChatGPT still sucks with anything requiring logical inference.
- RHSman2 4y agoIf I ask you a question that requires you to have a set of dependencies to solve you would need to understand the meaningful outcome of them as they were inputs into the next issue. You understand the ‘thing’ not just the associated words to reply. ChatGPT has zero knowledge of the world other than language.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]