In Lisp, the boundary between a little macro library and new language is fuzzy. But my code looks pretty radically different from textbook CL code, much more d

In Lisp, the boundary between a little macro library and new language is fuzzy. But my code looks pretty radically different from textbook CL code, much more different that, say, Scheme code looks from textbook CL code, and no one would dispute that Scheme is a different language. Maybe I should have said that I don't code in idiomatic CL any more. > SBCL is thriving... Indeed. The CL ecosystem in general is doing very well. It is only CCL that is fading away, and hopefully even that is only a temporary setback.