I don't think it's that bad of a comment, but "probably because 90+%" is a LOT of hedging to make a point. I could see it doing better if the comment tried to b

I don't think it's that bad of a comment, but "probably because 90+%" is a LOT of hedging to make a point. I could see it doing better if the comment tried to back up the claim with something a bit more substantive or even an anecdote (despite the obvious flaws with reasoning from anecdotes, they can still be fun to read in a way that adds to the conversation). Then again maybe I'm missing the same thing you are.