3 ms·
I mean sure compulsory dragnet surveillance of 20% of Americans with basically no oversight, where the data is shared with exactly the people in their lives in
by Spivak 4y ago
I mean sure compulsory dragnet surveillance of 20% of Americans with basically no oversight, where the data is shared with exactly the people in their lives in a position to harm them with it, that’s fine. But now we don’t automatically tell you who the gay kids are, you have to look for yourselves. What a joke.
- ravi-delia 4y agoBut if school districts can't mandate children bring home webcams to remotely view and browsers to spy on, how can they possibly keep them safe from breaking pointless rules in the privacy of their own home? Or having any private conversations whatsoever? Won't anyone think of the children?
- firecall 4y agoI essentially tell my tweeners to not say a damn thing online. The nonsense that comes out of kids mouths on these discord chats when they are gaming - both written and spoken - is just... childish. They use words and phrases they don't understand, they push the boundaries and get carried away. Like kids are supposed to. But out of context these things could easily be used to 'cancel' them when these kids are older.
- daenney 4y agoIt seems the line of thinking here is “bad things happen to other people so fuck queer kids”? I don’t quite see why dragnet surveillance and exposing queer kids to additional risk and abuse can’t be bad at the same time.
- deworms 4y ago[dead]