I thought that the implication was that the budget grew by a factor of ~20, not 2. As in, the first 95% finished in 95% of the original budget, the rest finishe

I thought that the implication was that the budget grew by a factor of ~20, not 2. As in, the first 95% finished in 95% of the original budget, the rest finished in 95% of the final budget, so the first 95% took 5% of the final budget. Hmm, maybe I didn't detect the sarcasm in your reply.