4 ms·

"You are trying to use some nice wording. But it's quite clear you are saying we should give the Russians a pass." I'm not even sure what to say to this... Go

"You are trying to use some nice wording. But it's quite clear you are saying we should give the Russians a pass." I'm not even sure what to say to this... Go back and read what I have posted, and then read your responses. I made a low effort post stating that this situation needs to get dealt with ASAP, and somehow you have turned this into me being a Russia sympathizer. Nothing I have posted indicates I think we should give the Russians a pass, or get away with anything. I have merely stated... "More pressure to get this Ukrainian (mis)adventure wrapped up ASAP I guess?" That continues to be my response. I anxiously await your next attempt to look intellectually superior to me. Laughing is good for the soul, after all.

credit_guy 4y ago
I'm not trying to look intellectually superior. But you are trying to be vague. The Russian invasion of Ukraine can be seen as an adventure or misadventure only from the Russian side. From the Ukrainian side, it's a fight for their life. From the US and NATO side, it's anything but an adventure. >More pressure to get this Ukrainian (mis)adventure wrapped up ASAP I guess? Pressure on whom? Clearly not on Russia. Russia has no reason to retreat if China attempts to invade Taiwan, on the contrary. Pressure on the US? Wrap up? Wrap up how? There are only 2 ways: 1. accelerate the arming with modern weapons of Ukraine, 2. negotiate with Russia some form of freezing of the conflict. 1 can lead to nuclear war, 2 is simply wrong. Now, it would be indeed great if you decided to clarify by your statement by which you continue to stand.