3 ms·
I think that's overly optimistic. It implies you can have a complete project with less than double your budget.
by aidenn0 4y ago
I think that's overly optimistic. It implies you can have a complete project with less than double your budget.
- pflanze 4y agoI thought that the implication was that the budget grew by a factor of ~20, not 2. As in, the first 95% finished in 95% of the original budget, the rest finished in 95% of the final budget, so the first 95% took 5% of the final budget. Hmm, maybe I didn't detect the sarcasm in your reply.
- aidenn0 4y agoOh that makes more sense. I thought both were in terms of the original budget