4 ms·
Being compatible with what's there is exactly the opposite of reinventing the wheel (mechanisms, protocols, etc.).
by tete 4y ago
Being compatible with what's there is exactly the opposite of reinventing the wheel (mechanisms, protocols, etc.).
- prophesi 4y agoThat's true, but it'd be even simpler to implement a node in x language that can communicate with Erlang/OTP, and let Erlang work its fault-tolerant and scalable magic.
- gfodor 4y agoThis is why analogies like the wheel analogy are silly - to stretch it closer to reality, sometimes you are eyeing a wheel in Go and a wheel in Erlang, so you’ve gotta pick which one to port.