3 ms·
No, you're just intentionally ignoring the word "plenty."
by guerrilla 4y ago
No, you're just intentionally ignoring the word "plenty."
- Idk__Throwaway 4y agoThere are "plenty" of cold days as well. Does that disprove global warming? Not only is "plenty" not an objective quantity, but even an objectively large quantity is irrelevant if it's not a large percentage of the whole. 100k geniuses with addiction problems wouldn't disprove the rule if there are 1b people with addiction problems who are of below average intelligence.
- themitigating 4y agoAs he should. Plenty is extremely vague. It definitely means more than 1, probably more than 3, but after that.
- 8note 4y agoIt's actually "genius" that's the problem. There aren't enough geniuses to affect a trend on their own. You could swap "plenty" to "every" and it would still have the same problem