3 ms·
Here is some constructive criticism for the authors: - Do not put your article behind a paywall. If you want the best scientists to look at your work they don'
by breck 4y ago
Here is some constructive criticism for the authors:
- Do not put your article behind a paywall. If you want the best scientists to look at your work they don't have much time to waste fiddling with logins and paywalls and so your work won't get analyzed by the people who could provide the most help. If you want to "win" in science in the long run, put it in the public domain. Or, to put it bluntly: #LicensesAreForLosers.
- You need to include a scatterplot up top. The importance thing when you talk about "cognitive function" is the distribution, not the average. If it lowers average cognitive function, but also increases odds of a higher outlier or two, then perhaps the tradeoff is worth it.
- thfuran 4y ago>you want the best scientists to look at your work they don't have much time to waste fiddling with logins and paywalls and so your work won't get analyzed by the people who could provide the most help. Won't they mostly be using some university IP with subscriptions to basically every journal and not see the paywalls in the first place? At least that was my experience of university.