I don't think that analogy is obvious. For example, the renter is paying the landlord for use of their property, while the occupational health employer is payin

I don't think that analogy is obvious. For example, the renter is paying the landlord for use of their property, while the occupational health employer is paying the employee for their time. If the doctor was paying the facility for use of equipment and access to patients it wouldn't be unreasonable for that contract to have some term where some minimum payment was expected.