I consider the assertion unsupported because it was asserted without support, as if no more controversial than to say that water's wet. Generally, when advancin

I consider the assertion unsupported because it was asserted without support, as if no more controversial than to say that water's wet. Generally, when advancing a heterodox claim, one does well to source it so that interlocutors and audience members can evaluate it on some more substantial basis than whether they feel like taking a stranger's word for it, which around here people mostly (and correctly!) won't.