3 ms·
That’s a very naïve outlook in reality like with every system the burden of proof would end up falling on the accused not the accuser…
by dogma1138 4y ago
That’s a very naïve outlook in reality like with every system the burden of proof would end up falling on the accused not the accuser…
- another-dave 4y agoWhat could that burden of proof look like? Not sure how a student could prove that the negative, apart from videotaping themselves writing the essay, or only being allowed type it on an airgapped machine owned by the university. Doesn't feel very feasible to implement.
- avereveard 4y agoand if the student is not a complete tool, he can definitely learn the output and replicate it very, very closely
- lupire 4y agoEven before GPT, schools should require students to submit derailed outlines and notes of their work. For one, students need to learn these skills. For two, it helps protect against more plagiarism and cheating.
- j_french 4y agoThe reality in my experience (as a university lecturer) is that the burden of proof very much falls on the accuser rather than the accused.
- dogma1138 4y agoHow is that? Students already are required to submit a lot of evidence with their work such as research notes, plans, lab work etc. to prove they’ve actually done that and if plagiarism detection systems flag any of their work they have to defend it rather than the institution having to investigate and build evidence on its own outside of w/e shoddy plagiarism detection system they bought told them.