2 ms·
>the 60% was from 7.6% right to 12.5% right. That seems like an absurd metric for judging the improvement in a test. It is wrong on both extremes, 1% to 5% is
by sebzim4500 4y ago
>the 60% was from 7.6% right to 12.5% right.
That seems like an absurd metric for judging the improvement in a test. It is wrong on both extremes, 1% to 5% is not really a 400% improvement and 99% to 100% is a drastic improvement despite only being a ~1% improvement by this metric.
- vinaychandranp 4y agoRelative error reduction might be a better way to talk about this. 1% to 5% would result in a relative error reduction of ~4% and 99% to 100% would be a 100% reduction in the error.