4 ms·
There is no way this is just some statistical words jumble phenomenon. Or it shows that some of us underestimate large phase spaces which never had a chance to
by wruza 4y ago
There is no way this is just some statistical words jumble phenomenon.
Or it shows that some of us underestimate large phase spaces which never had a chance to emerge naturally and take it too close to heart.
AI may have what you talk about in two ways:
1. Built-in as a part of its engineering. This would require a learning set that we don’t have. We have pics, text and combinations of these. No emotion, motivation, live experience, etc.
2. Emerged statistically in pockets of its training results. While we can hypothesize that it is possible, it’s akin to kicking a multi-joint pendulum (of insane order) and expecting it to get stuck in a way that resembles Mona Lisa.
Your reasoning itt is based on ignoring false results and writing them off as chatgpt’s intended lies and other tricks humans might do. But you have to explain how that works based on a NN structure, computation method and time (step number) constraints it physically and immutably has.
- kilgnad 4y agoNo I'm not writing off the bad results. Also let's be clear. I'm not claiming that chatGPT has motivation or emotion. My claim is that it actually understands things. It understands self as well. My claim is that despite the bad results the good results are so complex it literally must take true understanding to formulate such a result. I get your point about phase space. But given that the underlying equation is made up of neurons and given we are made up of neurons it's not far off to say that human intelligence and LLM intelligence are just similar aspects of the same concept.