You're anthropomorphizing too much and it is a mistake to do so. It didn't lie or make a careless error other than from the perspective of the human interactin

You're anthropomorphizing too much and it is a mistake to do so. It didn't lie or make a careless error other than from the perspective of the human interacting with it. It executed its programming exactly. Its programming is to take human readable language and generate a response, the exact procedure of this process of course being much more detailed. You need to understand, that's all it does. So it didn't lie or make a mistake, it just isn't actually thinking so it can't do what you want it to, which is reason about something.