3 ms·
I read the article, and to me it seems that the "mind-blowing ending" is ChatGPT operating of a stack depth of 1. In fact, I think the ending is less impressiv
by tome 4y ago
I read the article, and to me it seems that the "mind-blowing ending" is ChatGPT operating of a stack depth of 1. In fact, I think the ending is less impressive than the rest of the article. I suspect we have a tendency to consider it to be more impressive merely due to our human biases.
- kilgnad 4y agoI agree with this. But in a broad sense. In order for chatGPT to operate at a stack depth of 1 it must understand what itself is. Awareness of itself is also known as self awareness. As humans we are biased and I feel we set a milestone for ai using self awareness as a metric based on these biases. It could be that Self awareness is actually a trivial concept and maybe not a good candidate for an AI milestone because chatGPT hit that milestone so trivially. We think we ourselves are so clever because of self awareness when in reality self awareness isn't that clever at all.